Former Alaska Governor Sparks Backlash With Proposal to End PFD: ‘Alaska Loves To Catch a Check’

Many people won’t be happy

Former Alaska Governor Bill Walker is drawing strong reactions online after proposing a major change to the state’s Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD). Walker, who recently registered as an independent candidate, suggested ending the annual payments after first issuing a one-time $10,000 payout to eligible Alaska residents. The proposal quickly sparked debate among Alaskans, many of whom rely on the dividend each year.

Bill Walker proposes ending the PFD — but not before a $10K payout per eligible Alaskan
byu/conzeeter inalaska

According to the Anchorage Daily News, Walker’s proposal would see eligible Alaskans receive one final $10,000 payment before the Permanent Fund Dividend program is phased out. Given the popularity of the annual checks, the idea quickly drew attention online.

While some commenters argued that Alaska needs to rethink how it funds government services in the future, many others pushed back on the idea of eliminating a program that has become a longstanding part of life for residents across the state.

Walker’s proposal quickly drew reactions across social media, where many commenters voiced concerns about ending the PFD and what it could mean for Alaska residents.

Alaska Residents Voiced Their Opinions on Walker’s Plans

Several Redditors talked about what Bill Walker was proposing, and it seems that many don’t think this might be the best course of action, but not because of the proposal itself, but because of how the government should have handled the PFD better.

If we depoliticized the PFD and required independent managers accountable to all three branches of the Alaska government, the PFD could fund this state for centuries.

Others, however, took it to the comments to criticize the plan and authorities as a whole, saying the fact that there’s going to be one final payout makes the plan look strange.

Alaska loves to catch a check and then talk about how independent they are.

The permanent fund could have funded the state perpetually; that was its original intent. The PFD isn’t funding anything; it’s a cost to the state.

Whether Walker’s proposal gains any real traction remains to be seen. For now, however, the suggestion has reignited a longstanding debate over the future of the PFD and how Alaska should fund government services, with many residents making it clear they are not ready to give up the annual dividend without a fight.

Понравилась статья? Поделиться с друзьями: